Thursday, 30 July 2015

Week 3 - Technology - Wiki Spaces, Blogs & Websites as Learning and Teaching Tools.

Week 3 Technology – Blogs, Wikis, Websites.

This reflection will explore a range of technology, namely web based spaces such as Wiki Spaces, websites and blogs. Links between the technology and its use by students and teachers within the classroom and beyond will be explored. The SAMR model will also be used to show possible classroom examples and links will be made to current and relevant learning theory.


Technical aspects.

Blogs, wiki spaces and websites are web-based applications, which can be modified individually or collaboratively. Modifications can be applied to content, structure, backgrounds, fonts, privacy settings, audio, video, images or links to name a few. Select groups may complete customisation or alternatively, editing rights may be held by an individual to restrict the adding or removal of certain materials. Blogs, wiki’s and websites functions can vary, from private and public purposes such as community forums on a website, the organisation of knowledge on a blog and general note taking on a wiki. They may also be used for a range of in-depth learning experiences, or simply for an individual to share information socially. Due to the open-ended nature of these online platforms, they are able to meet the dynamic needs of the contributors as the editors constantly update the spaces in the form of posts that are seen by users by the date they were submitted. This helps the users to follow the ongoing feed of information with ease. Users are not restricted by time or space as they add to the spaces, and can do so simultaneously from the comfort of their own home. Some platforms such as a wiki space, for example are more collaborative in this sense, compare to a website, which is usually used as a means to share information, rather than to provide a collective discussion. Users can access these spaces using a variety of means, including subscribing to a feed or simply by being accessed via a web search.  The platforms are also quite complex and in-depth, providing users the opportunity to embed apps within the space, further enhancing the experience for users on a multimodal level.

These spaces can be used in an endless amount of classroom contexts, from simple, lower level information sharing, through to aiding students complete complex reasoning processes. A Plus, Minus, Interesting chart will be used to further investigate these online spaces.

Wiki Spaces

Plus
Students can take ownership of their own ‘space’.
Students can access information anywhere, at any time.
Some students may feel more comfortable typing than writing or participating in a classroom discussion.
Easy way to manage/incorporate whole class with numerous authors at once.
Parents may also be able to access and monitor student work at home.
Allows teachers to provide timely and relevant feedback with ease.
User friendly and engaging for digital natives.
Allows students to store and collect information to add, edit and reflect upon.
Shows evidence of students learning and engagement.
Can be used for formative and summative assessment.
Can provide open ended or carefully scaffolded guides to activities to encourage higher order thinking.
Encourages discussion and consideration of other point of views and opinions.
Allows students with disabilities or speech difficulties to participate.
Templates can be changed to suit a range of activities.
Ability to link or add apps/images/links etc.
Can be a safe platform with the use of privacy settings and passwords.
Teaches use of online platforms that students will encounter late in life and should be proficient in to be active 21st Century citizens.

Minus
Could encourage cyber bullying as they post on each other’s pages.
Must be constantly monitored by teacher – this could be difficult.
Construction of templates may take time, and may not always work.
Students may plagiarise other student’s content.
Time must be spent on teaching the appropriate ways to contribute to spaces, such as copyrights, cyber bullying, privacy issues etc.
Numerous authors can create issues with content, such as accidentally erasing others or their own work.
May not suit students from low socio-economic areas who may not have easy access to computers or the internet.

Interesting
Can be used as effective technology integration (SAMR Model) starting from substation, for example a wiki can be used instead of a ‘normal’ classroom discussion. This could lead to Augmentation as students employ higher order thinking skills as they view other’s wiki posts and in turn other’s opinions. Modification can be utilised to create new tasks, such as embed a Wordle into their own wiki space and reach vast audiences that they could not otherwise reach if they had not created a wiki space on the Internet. Redefinition would then be constructed by the students and the teachers collaboratively, as they use this new found knowledge and apply to new situations and receive feedback from professionals in specific fields. A wiki platform also comes under the social constructivist and connectivist learning theories, as students learn by discovery and social experiences, with the teacher facilitating the learning. The learning should also be intrinsically motivated as they students engage in collaborative learning.

Blogs

Plus
Engaging tool for digital natives.
Students can take ownership of their own space and learning journey.
Information can be added, editing and removed as the user sees fit.
Can be used as a tool to follow students learning journey’s with ease as the information is posted chronologically.
Could be used as formal or information formative and summative assessment.
Students can experience a range of views and opinions with ease.
Access to blogs can be password protected, and students can decide to has access to their blogs.
Students can access blogs anywhere and work at a their own pace.
Students can refine skills they will need as a 21st century citizen.
Students can access professional’s  and expert’s blogs and communicate with them with ease.
Easy to edit and personalise.
Teachers can provide timely and relevant feedback on blogs.
Posts can be set up to be checked and approved by the teacher before the are publicly posted.
Can be a great tool for students with a disability or who struggle with classroom discussions.
Blogs on the Learning Place are safe an appropriate for classroom use.

Minus
Time must be spent on teaching students how to use blogs appropriately to ensure their safety in regards to cyber bullying and privacy, as well as copyrighting issues.
Students may have issues setting up blogs, and may not complete tasks.
Could encourage cyber bullying as students post inappropriate comments.
Teachers may find it difficult and time consuming to monitor and access all student’s blogs.
Could be difficult to use as a whole class activity, or provide information via the blog to all students.
Students may plagiarise other student’s work.
Technology occasionally is unreliable, and student’s work may be lost or deleted.
Hands on or kinaesthetic learners may struggle.
Could be an issue for low socio-economic students, as the may have issues with access, or lack the skills to create and maintain a blog.

Interesting
Similarly to a Wiki, a blog can be used as effective technology integration - again using the SAMR Model - starting from substation, for example a blog can be used instead of a ‘normal’ classroom project or presentation on a specific topic. This could lead to Augmentation as students employ higher order thinking skills as they view other’s blogs and in turn other’s opinions. Modification can be utilised to create new tasks, such as embed appas and outside links and images into their own blogs and reach vast audiences that they could not otherwise reach if they had not created a blog on the Internet. Redefinition would then be constructed by the students and the teachers collaboratively, as they use this new found knowledge and apply to new situations and receive feedback from professionals in specific fields, further enhancing their learning and adding to their knowledge. A blog also comes under the social constructivist and connectivist learning theories, as students learn by discovery and social experiences, with the teacher facilitating the learning. The learning should also be intrinsically motivated as they students engage in collaborative learning, as per the wiki.

Websites
Plus
Students can control their own learning and take ownership of their own space.
Content can be continuously added, reviewed and updated.
Integration of apps or external links can be added such as videos and images – multimedia.
Engaging learning tool for digital natives.
Provides and opportunity to refine important technological skills needed for the 21st Century.
Could be used as a formative and summative assessment tool.
Easy to access and create for students and teachers.
Pages and templates can be personalised and edited to suit a range of purposes.
Provides a platform to track and reflect on learning.
Parents can access and view student’s work.
Can be accessed and viewed by teachers and students at any time, anywhere.
Students with a disability or quiet students can participate with ease.
Provides an alternative way to present work, or can further enhance and back up work that has already been completed.

Minus
Could be difficult for teacher to monitor all students’ websites in a timely manner.
Could encourage cyber bullying.
Time must be spent on teaching proper etiquette on the Internet to discourage cyber bullying and promote correct use of copyright and privacy issues.
Technology may not always be reliable, and work may be erased or lost.
Could be difficult for teachers to communicate with whole class.
Design of websites and scaffolding of activities could take time.
Platform does not allow for numerous authors at once.
May not be as secure a platform as a Learning Place blog.
Does not allow for as much collaboration as a Wiki Space.

Interesting
As per a blog and a wiki, websites can be used as effective technology integration - again using the SAMR Model - starting from substation, for example a website can be used instead of a book review presentation or specific writing tasks such as report writing or creative writing. This could lead to Augmentation as students employ higher order thinking skills as they view other’s websites and in turn are exposed to new information. Modification can be utilised to create new tasks, such as embed images, videos and outside links and images into their own websites and reach vast audiences that they could not otherwise reach if they had not created a website. Redefinition would then be constructed by the students and the teachers collaboratively, as they use this new found knowledge and apply to new situations and receive feedback from professionals in specific fields, further enhancing their learning and adding to their knowledge. A website also comes under the social constructivist and connectivist learning theories, as students learn by discovery and social experiences, with the teacher facilitating the learning. The learning should also be intrinsically motivated as they students engage in collaborative learning as they access and view other students’ blogs.

Comparison of Blogs, Wikis and Websites as learning and teaching tools.

As learners and teachers in the 21st Century, it is imperative that tools such as these are utilised in the classroom. More importantly, however, is that teachers ensure that they are used effectively, as not just as direct tool substitutes (SAMR), but used to design and create new tasks. Collaboration must also be integrated within rich and engaging learning experiences, which is used appropriately, all of these platforms can provide. With personal experience I have found, however that a Wiki Space provides the best opportunity for student and teacher collaboration. As discovered in the participation of the De Bono’s hats activity, contributions and edits could be made with ease. Tasks were scaffolded carefully, and students could easily be self-directed through the task. Collaboration could be seen on one page, and teachers could access and mark students’ work with ease. A wiki can be a great classroom tool for creating discussions and constructing new knowledge, making it also a great tool for formative or diagnostic assessment. These tasks would be slightly more time consuming with a blog, for example. Having experienced setting up and posting on Blogger for the first time, I found this to be slightly more complicated. It was more difficult to discover peers work, however, I enjoyed the fact that I could personalise and edit my own space. Students would not have this sense of ownership and responsibility on a Wiki Space. The ‘circles’ on friends you can create makes for easy interaction, and blogs make it easy to communicate with professionals and pages you would not otherwise have access to. Blogs can be great tools for creating personalised learning journeys and reflections in a safe and secure platform.  Blogging may also be a way to help improve students’ writing skills, sharing research, and generally improving ICT skills. Websites, I found, had again lightly less of a collaborative theme. While students can create and publish in their own spaces, and view others pages, the connections are fewer.  Websites have a more professional presentation to them, and could be used to publish final drafts of projects such as book reviews or themed projects. My personal experience with a website in a learning setting has occurred when we were required to showcase information for other professionals, such as a complete unit plan or specific lesson plans. I found a Weebly was easy to navigate and customise without much effort, and looked professional and organised. Students would enjoy personalising their own space, and teachers can easily navigate their work and provide feedback. Teachers may also use all of the above to communicate with other educators and gather and share information with peers from across the school, or across the globe.

Overall, all above-mentioned online platforms can be useful in an educational setting for both educators and students alike, however special consideration must be given to the authenticity and complexity of the tasks to ensure that using this type of technology is worthwhile.

Evidence of exploration

Below are the links to the above-mentioned technology that I have explored either as a part of this course, or as required by other courses.

Blog
http://samgleesonelearning.blogspot.com.au

Wiki

Weebly


Wednesday, 22 July 2015

Week 2 Reflection - De Bono's Hats Wiki Activity.

Week 2 Reflection.

This reflection aims to link personal experience, learning theory, and the design and purpose of the recently completed wiki activity. Consideration will be given to the specific theories that support the design of the task, and the purpose and value of the scaffolding provided and how learning outcomes were met through the use of the scaffolds.

De Bono’s Thinking Hats & Wiki Task Analysis.

Collaboration and the sharing of varying opinions were the underpinning ideas of this task. Students were able to join groups – often with students they were unfamiliar with – to answer specific questions relating to the topic of mobile phones within the classroom. The wiki was designed with the sections and relevant questions clearly defined, and students could navigate, read and edit responses with ease.

While on the surface this may seem a fairly superficial task, learning theories support many elements of this activity. The most obvious theory at first glance would be Connectivism. Often touted as ‘a learning theory for the digital age’, connectivism is reflective of today’s social environment (Kop & Hill, 2008). And is based on our ever changing, dynamic world. The key principals of - knowledge and learning lying in the range of opinions, the connection of specialised information and maintaining and promoting connections to enable ongoing learning (Siemens, 2008) - link directly to this activity. Connections were made during this activity as learners from various areas and various times contributed to the wiki. A range of opinions were read, considered and analysed, and this information was regarding a very specific topic.

Cognitive Constructivism (Snowman, 2009) also supports this activity, as students developed new knowledge on top of existing knowledge as they read others contributions, whilst still promoting individualised responses. The way in which the task was set out also follows a constructivst approach; by ensuring the framework was easily to follow to accommodate the learner’s knowledge (Snowman, 2009).

This task did oppose the learning theory of Behaviourism however, as this expects learners to recall facts of predefined knowledge (Nagowah & Nagowah, 2009). The teacher during this task was also the facilitator, unlike in a Behaviourist approach, whereby the teacher is the transmitter of knowledge. This task did not also have right or wrong answers, as it was purely individual opinion, which again, opposes this theory whereby success is indicated by the number of correct answers given. Behaviourism often encourages only low-level cognitive thinking, and for today’s learners, is not seen as good pedagogy.

Good pedagogy aims to provide deep knowledge by incorporating collaborative, problem based tasks that are relevant to the learners and can be applied in everyday contexts (Snowman, 2009). The purpose of this specifically scaffolded task was not on the content, but rather the process. Outcomes were achieved through the collaborative concept, and the analysis of varying ideas, promoting higher order thinking within students, rather than a superficial task that requires only the regurgitation of facts. Good pedagogy also requires learning managers to choose relevant and engaging content for students, which is was for this specific set of learners. Information was linked to prior knowledge of the subject and the learning was then owned, controlled and managed by the students, further enhancing the learning experience, as students gain a sense of ownership and community.

Upon reflection, this task could be easily translated into a regular classroom context, as an effective tool to engage higher order thinking processes. The key aspect is the teacher acting as the facilitator, while students view a range of opinions and discuss and analyse new information collaboratively in a carefully scaffolded, purposefully designed and easy to navigate manner.




Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning Theory of the Future or Vestige of the Past?. International Review Of Research In Open And Distance Learning, 9(3), 1-13.

Nagowah, L., & Nagowah, S. (2009). A Reflection on the Dominant Learning Theories: Behaviourism, Cognitivism and Constructivism. International Journal Of Learning, 16(2), 279-285
Siemens, G. (2008a). About: Description of connectivism. Connectivism: A learning theory for today’s learner, website. http://www.connectivism.ca/about.html
Snowman, J. (2009). Psychology applied to teaching. Milton, Qld. : John Wiley & Sons Australia, 2009.


The Pedagogy Wheel V2.0

I found this great model when looking into SAMR. It shows a number of apps that can be used in each of the four domains. Interesting!

Thursday, 16 July 2015

So it seems I am blogging...

Ah, the wonders of technology! I grew up with the stuff, so you'd assume I'd be more capable at setting up a blog, but it has proved to be nothing short of a nightmare.

I should be classed as a 'digital native', I guess. I remember having the old Apple computers in Kindergarten back in 1993, and grew up with computers becoming an ever increasing presence in the classroom. But this task has seriously got me questioning my skills. This is the unknown! Although it is slightly reminiscent of MySpace, so I have managed to upload a pretty header, and change my layout. Winning!

Now to work out the rest of it...